Technology Contractors Left Exposed to Litigation

Posted on
Share on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone

<p><strong>Warren, N.J. &mdash; Sept. 18</strong><br />The lack of familiarity with federal acquisition regulations and government immunities can leave U.S. government contractors exposed to costly lawsuits from customers and business partners.<br /><br />To address the complex and unique risks that information and network technology companies face serving the federal government, the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies has assembled a dedicated group of underwriters, loss-control engineers and claim specialists, and it and has created specialized products and services for federal contractors in close collaboration with outside legal counsel.<br /><br />Chubb also has developed relationships with a cadre of agents and brokers who will focus on arranging insurance programs for government contractors. </p><p>Further, Chubb has compiled a proprietary database of independent contractors that enter into U.S. government contracts and would benefit from Chubb&rsquo;s specialized expertise and product offerings.<br /><br />&ldquo;To better understand the marketplace, we are continually educating ourselves, our producers and our customers,&rdquo; said Richard Reed, vice president of Chubb & Son and Chubb Commercial Insurance federal government segment manager.<br /><br />Contractors working for the Department of Defense or on national security initiatives often engage in a broad array of business activities. </p><p>As a result, Chubb has introduced a new errors and omissions insurance policy than can help protect contractors for a variety of work they perform for the U.S. government.<br /><br />&ldquo;As their business offerings become more diverse, federal contractors that focus primarily on technology should make sure they extend their E&O insurance to all areas,&rdquo; Reed said. &ldquo;Previously, they needed to buy additional policies for this purpose. Now, Chubb can offer them a single policy to address their E&O-related exposures.&rdquo;<br /><br />Many of these businesses mistakenly think the work they perform for the government is protected by governmental immunity, Reed said. </p><p>&ldquo;In reality, immunity statutes are no panacea,” he said. “For example, suits can be initiated by business partners beyond the scope of the government contract, and immunity statutes are subject to legal attack by zealous plaintiffs.” </p><p>As a general rule, immunity statutes protect contractors from liability when they perform in accordance with government design specifications and take steps to adequately warn the government of actual or inherent risk. </p><p>But immunity statutes are only a defense &mdash; contractors still must defend themselves against lawsuits. </p><p>Further, many product or services that contractors develop for the federal government end up on the commercial market or with governments overseas. </p><p>In these cases, any immunity that may have been granted by the U.S. government will no longer apply.</p>

Share on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
cmadmin

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Posted in Archive|

Comment:

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>