Change Programs Fail if Employees Don’t Rationale

Posted on
Like what you see? Share it.Share on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone

<p><strong>London &mdash; July 16</strong><br />In one of the 27 interviews with change and communication experts published in the comprehensive new report, &quot;Delivering Successful Change Communication,&quot; Roger D&#39;Aprix, vice president of ROI Communication and author of &quot;Communicating for Change,&quot; stresses the importance of keeping the employee perspective in mind at all times. </p><p>&quot;That&#39;s one of the great failings of companies in the midst of change and all the chaos that surrounds it,&quot; he said. &quot;People tend to forget that there are human beings on the<br />other side.&quot;<br /><br />But to create a compelling rationale for change, communicators must look outside the organization, D&#39;Aprix said. </p><p>&quot;I firmly believe the only way you can rationalize the change is by reference to the marketplace and the forces that are driving the organization,&quot; he said.<br /><br />The problem is that internal communication professionals are not nearly well enough linked to the external aspects of the business. </p><p>&quot;My observation is that communication people have been craft people,&quot; he said. &quot;They&#39;ve focused on the media and content they create without understanding the organization they&#39;re part of, and more particularly, the marketplace. This aspect needs work and communicators must pay more attention to it.&quot;<br /><br />In the report, D&#39;Aprix summarizes the critical issues employees need to understand, particularly during continuous change, i.e. when change has become &quot;business as usual&quot; for the organization. </p><p>Employees need to know:</p><ol><li>Who is our competition?</li><li>What is the competition doing?</li><li>What choices does the customer have in dealing with us as an organization?</li><li>What are the customer&#39;s needs and demands?</li><li>What about our shareholders and the financial community &mdash; what are their needs and expectations?</li><li>What technological forces are affecting our organization, our products and our services?</li></ol><p>The role of leadership during change is another common theme running through the 21 case studies published in the report. </p><p>Senior communicators from global corporations such as Shell, Intel, Vodafone and Ford Motor Credit, agreed visible leadership was crucial to keeping their change programs on track, even when the changes being communicated were unpopular.<br /><br />In a case study on sustaining employee engagement during a major restructuring at Ford Motor Credit, Communications Director Chris Solie described how honesty and vision from the company&#39;s leaders was key to<br />maintaining morale and engagement. </p><p>&quot;Employees respect our CEO for giving them the hard facts and presenting them with a plan for the company&#39;s future,&quot; Solie said.</p><p>D&#39;Aprix agreed</p><p>&quot;Leadership at a time like this has to be extremely visible and doing lots of face-to-face communication,&quot; he said. &quot;The good, solid leaderships do this fairly naturally. The bad ones keep it all secret and quiet, and they pretend that everything is fine. That&#39;s a recipe for disaster.&quot;</p>

Like what you see? Share it.Share on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone


Posted in Archive|


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>